4 files changed, 24 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/ref/issue-3481-cite-location.png b/tests/ref/issue-3481-cite-location.png
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..cfc13db5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/ref/issue-3481-cite-location.png
diff --git a/tests/ref/issue-footnotes-skip-first-page.png b/tests/ref/issue-footnotes-skip-first-page.png
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d24387e3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/ref/issue-footnotes-skip-first-page.png
diff --git a/tests/suite/model/cite.typ b/tests/suite/model/cite.typ
index c6bdccb1..df8b7e76 100644
--- a/tests/suite/model/cite.typ
+++ b/tests/suite/model/cite.typ
@@ -90,3 +90,20 @@ B #cite(<netwok>) #cite(<arrgh>).
 
 #show bibliography: none
 #bibliography("/assets/bib/works.bib")
+
+--- issue-3481-cite-location ---
+// The locator was cloned in the wrong location, leading to inconsistent
+// citation group locations in the second footnote attempt.
+#set page(height: 60pt)
+
+// First page shouldn't be empty because otherwise we won't skip the first
+// region which causes the bug in the first place.
+#v(10pt)
+
+// Everything moves to the second page because we want to keep the line and
+// its footnotes together.
+#footnote[@netwok]
+#footnote[A]
+
+#show bibliography: none
+#bibliography("/assets/bib/works.bib")
diff --git a/tests/suite/model/footnote.typ b/tests/suite/model/footnote.typ
index c41db577..34450ca4 100644
--- a/tests/suite/model/footnote.typ
+++ b/tests/suite/model/footnote.typ
@@ -180,3 +180,10 @@ B #footnote[b]
 
 - #footnote[1]
 - #footnote[2]
+
+--- issue-footnotes-skip-first-page ---
+// In this issue, we would get an empty page at the beginning because footnote
+// layout didn't properly check for in_last.
+#set page(height: 50pt)
+#footnote[A]
+#footnote[B]