| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-16 | Add Value type and replace dyn-nodes with call-exprs 🏗 | Laurenz | |
| - In addition to syntax trees there are now `Value`s, which syntax trees can be evaluated into (e.g. the tree is `5+5` and the value is `10`) - Parsing is completely pure, function calls are not parsed into nodes, but into simple call expressions, which are resolved later - Functions aren't dynamic nodes anymore, but simply functions which receive their arguments as a table and the layouting context - Functions may return any `Value` - Layouting is powered by functions which return the new `Commands` value, which informs the layouting engine what to do - When a function returns a non-`Commands` value, the layouter simply dumps the value into the document in monospace | |||
| 2020-08-16 | Remove tuples and objects in favor of tables 🛢 | Laurenz | |
| This refactores the parser tests to make them more concise and flexible with regards to spans. | |||
| 2020-08-14 | Desugar body into last argument 🍩 | Laurenz | |
| 2020-08-14 | Always parse bodies as syntax trees 🌳 | Laurenz | |
| Previously they were passed as strings to the function parser, now they are parsed and then passed as trees to the function. This allows making bodies sugar for a last content argument. While it removes some flexibility allowing function to parse arbitrary syntaxes in their bodies, these can be modelled as (raw) string arguments. | |||
| 2020-08-04 | Refactor function parsing ♻ | Laurenz | |
