| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #2419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#2364)
|
|
Fixes #2358.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before we tested with an unavailable font, but the hyphens were still visible. But now the hyphens respect fallback too, so it's really hard to test it. I am removing the test for now.
|
|
In the unlikely chance that we hyphenate after an empty line, we
set the glyph range to self.base..self.base so that subtracting
Fixes #2283.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This just fixes a mistake previously made. `0.3` is the correct number that is proportional to the parameters in Knuth's paper. The previously choosed value `300` is due to my calculation mistake and is too large that essentially prevent any consecutive hyphens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #1879
|
|
|
|
Fixes #1948
|
|
Fixes #2128
|
|
Co-authored-by: Laurenz <laurmaedje@gmail.com>
|
|
|