summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs/modules/stem
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGuillaume Grossetie <ggrossetie@gmail.com>2022-08-22 20:47:27 +0200
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2022-08-22 12:47:27 -0600
commitd72fe54346aa6963ae835f48681fa1ed917fb3fe (patch)
tree4896c6906efb3ee81aebde948580dd46767eb7c4 /docs/modules/stem
parent81e3e772f1294f85a5be7d34d06e132494c44e5b (diff)
proofread documentation (PR #4336)
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/modules/stem')
-rw-r--r--docs/modules/stem/pages/mathematical.adoc2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/docs/modules/stem/pages/mathematical.adoc b/docs/modules/stem/pages/mathematical.adoc
index 6b77a72a..c8087fc6 100644
--- a/docs/modules/stem/pages/mathematical.adoc
+++ b/docs/modules/stem/pages/mathematical.adoc
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ The extension can be used with the built-in converters as well as add-on convert
The main drawback of Asciidoctor Mathematical when compared to MathJax is that you don't have a lot of control over the size and resolution of the images it generates.
It also lacks the interactivity with the expression that MathJax provides.
-So when your converting to HTML, MathJax is going to give you a better result.
+So when you're converting to HTML, MathJax is going to give you a better result.
Another drawback when compared to MathJax is that it requires installing an extra library, and that library can be difficult to install.
Nonetheless, if you need it and you're up for the challenge, that's where we're headed next.